Page 128 - Remedial Andrology
P. 128

9.3.4.5   Recommendations for the treatment of arterial priapism

                        Recommendations                                                         Strength rating
                        Because non-ischaemic priapism is not an emergency, perform definitive management at   Weak
                        the discretion of the treating physician.
                        Manage conservatively with the use of site-specific perineal compression as the first step.   Weak
                        Consider androgen deprivation therapy only in adults.
                        Perform selective arterial embolisation when conservative management has failed.  Strong
                        Perform first selective arterial embolisation using temporary material.  Weak
                        Repeat the procedure with temporary or permanent material for recurrent non ischaemic   Weak
                        priapism following selective arterial embolisation.
                        Reserve selective surgical ligation of a fistula as a final treatment option when repeated   Weak
                        arterial embolisations have failed.

                        9.3.4.6   High-flow priapism in children
                        Non-ischaemic priapism is a rare condition, especially in children. The embarrassment that children may have
                        in  speaking  about  it  to their parents can lead to  misdiagnosis and underestimating the  prevalence  of this
                        condition [1434]. The aetiology, clinical presentation and diagnostic and therapeutic principles are comparable
                        with those of arterial priapism in adults. However, some differentiating features should be noted.

                        Idiopathic non-ischaemic priapism can be found in a significant percentage of children  [1435]. Perineal
                        compression with the thumb may be a useful manoeuvre to distinguish ischaemic and non-ischaemic priapism,
                        particularly in children, where it may result in immediate detumescence, followed by the return of the erection
                        with the removal of compression [1399]. Conservative management using ice applied to the perineum or site-
                        specific perineal compression may be successful, particularly in children  [1436, 1437]. Although reportedly
                        successful, embolisation  in children  is technically  challenging and requires  treatment within a specialist
                        paediatric vascular radiology department [1284, 1438].

                        9.3.4.7   Follow-up
                        During conservative management of non-ischaemic priapism, physical examination and colour duplex US
                        can be useful tools to assess treatment efficacy. Close follow-up using colour duplex US and MRI can help
                        detect distal penile fibrosis and be beneficial in clinical decision-making to intervene with embolisation earlier
                        [1420]. Follow-up after selective arterial embolisation should include clinical examination, colour duplex US,
                        and erectile function assessment. If in doubt, repeat arteriography is required. The goals are to determine if
                        the treatment was successful, identify signs of recurrence, and verify any anatomical and functional sequelae
                        [1413].

                        9.4     Controversies and future areas of focus in the management of priapism
                        Low-flow priapism should be considered as a surgical emergency. Although the treatment of high-flow priapism
                        can be delayed, there is some evidence to suggest that a delay in intervention may result in long-term fibrosis
                        of the corpus cavernosum.

                        The evidence in the literature mainly consists of retrospective single centre cohort studies and therefore is
                        of low quality, and prospective multicentre studies are needed to develop high levels of evidence to support
                        contemporary guidelines.

                        There are a number of controversial areas including the prophylaxis of stuttering priapism, with no real
                        evidence suggesting the superiority of a single pharmaceutical agent over another. In particular understanding
                        of the time point at which irreversible corporal smooth muscle necrosis occurs due to low-flow priapism
                        is limited; therefore, definitive management of delayed or refractory priapism remains controversial (i.e.,
                        immediate prosthesis implantation vs. penoscrotal decompression vs. shunting). Therefore, it is strongly
                        recommended  that multi-centre collaborative studies are performed to better understand this  rare  but
                        devastating condition.













                        SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH - MARCH 2021                                       127
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133