Page 247 - Remedial Andrology

1571. Agarwal, A., et al. Oxidation-reduction potential as a new marker for oxidative stress: Correlation to
male infertility. Investig Clin Urol, 2017. 58: 385.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29124237
1572. Lu, Y., et al. Long-term follow-up of children conceived through assisted reproductive technology*.
J Zhejiang Univ Sci B, 2013. 14: 359.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23645173
1573. Kushnir, V.A., et al. Systematic review of worldwide trends in assisted reproductive technology
2004-2013. Reprod Biol Endocrinol, 2017. 15: 6.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28069012
1574. Rinaudo, P., et al. Transitioning from Infertility-Based (ART 1.0) to Elective (ART 2.0) Use of Assisted
Reproductive Technologies and the DOHaD Hypothesis: Do We Need to Change Consenting?
Semin Reprod Med, 2018. 36: 204.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30866007
1575. Kallen, B., et al. In vitro fertilization in Sweden: child morbidity including cancer risk. Fertil Steril,
2005. 84: 605.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16169392
1576. Schieve, L.A., et al. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted
reproductive technology. N Engl J Med, 2002. 346: 731.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11882728
1577. Bonduelle, M., et al. A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children
conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Hum
Reprod, 2005. 20: 413.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15576393
1578. El-Chaar, D., et al. Risk of birth defects increased in pregnancies conceived by assisted Human
Reprod. Fertil Steril, 2009. 92: 1557.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18973885
1579. Davies, M.J., et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med, 2012.
366: 1803.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmoa1008095
1580. Rimm, A.A., et al. A meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF
and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J Assist Reprod Genet, 2004. 21: 437.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15704519
1581. Hansen, M., et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects--a systematic
review. Hum Reprod, 2005. 20: 328.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15567881
1582. Wen, J., et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm
injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril, 2012. 97: 1331.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22480819
1583. Rumbold, A.R., et al. Impact of male factor infertility on offspring health and development. Fertil
Steril, 2019. 111: 1047.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31155114
1584. La Rovere, M., et al. Epigenetics and Neurological Disorders in ART. Int J Mol Sci, 2019. 20.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31454921
1585. Bertoncelli Tanaka, M., et al. Paternal age and assisted reproductive technology: problem solver or
trouble maker? Panminerva Med, 2019. 61: 138.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30021419
1586. Kissin, D.M., et al. Association of assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatment and parental
infertility diagnosis with autism in ART-conceived children. Hum Reprod, 2015. 30: 454.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25518976
1587. Pinborg, A., et al. Epigenetics and assisted reproductive technologies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,
2016. 95: 10.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26458360
1588. Jiang, Z., et al. Genetic and epigenetic risks of assisted reproduction. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet
Gynaecol, 2017. 44: 90.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28844405
1589. Sutcliffe, A.G., et al. A retrospective case-control study of developmental and other outcomes in a
cohort of Australian children conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection compared with a similar
group in the United Kingdom. Fertil Steril, 2003. 79: 512.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12620432

246 SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH - MARCH 2021